Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> | ||
| Cc: | Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] timezone configuration - why copying, not symlinking /etc/localtime ? | ||
| Date: | Sun, 21 Mar 2021 05:27:57 | ||
| Message-Id: | ueeg96ppt@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] timezone configuration - why copying, not symlinking /etc/localtime ? by Alec Warner |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Sun, 21 Mar 2021, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | >> Which doesn't imply that we deliberately break things. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | > Not sure I follow.. how is updating the handbook breaking anything? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Both configurations (regular file and symlink) work just fine, and |
| 8 | sys-libs/timezone-data supports them. I don't see a good reason why we |
| 9 | would suddenly declare the regular file to be an invalid option. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Ulrich |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] timezone configuration - why copying, not symlinking /etc/localtime ? | Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> |