| 1 |
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 10:42 -0600, Jason Wever wrote: |
| 2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> OK, let's review this again. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> If you cannot test a given ebuild on a given arch, then don't touch that |
| 8 |
> arch's keyword (unless you need to remove it for broken dependencies). |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> If you can test for a given arch and are not part of that arch team, |
| 11 |
> please please please let the arch teams know that before you go around |
| 12 |
> keywording things arbitrarily. It makes the baby Jesus cry when you don't |
| 13 |
> and really isn't the greatest from a QA perspective either. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Sorry folks this was my fault. I've sent my grovelling apology to the |
| 16 |
sparc team. Hopefully they'll accept my apologies and put my digressions |
| 17 |
down to me being a new dev. :-) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Actually I did do fairly thorough testing / QA but I didn't tell the |
| 20 |
arch team before keywording (bad me!). |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
In case anyone is interested; this is about the Haskell packages which I |
| 23 |
hope to get up to scratch on sparc (with the consent and approval of the |
| 24 |
sparc team in future!) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Duncan |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives