| 1 |
On Monday 23 July 2001 21:50, you wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:49:36PM +0300, Dan Armak wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I understand that. Problem is, most packages don't have a published list |
| 4 |
> > for the basic utilities which they use. To find out you basically have to |
| 5 |
> > read the Makefile and look for any such commands. Buildinig an 'empty' |
| 6 |
> > system that doesn't even have flex etc. sounds rather difficult, unless I |
| 7 |
> > just remove flex from an existing one. So in really high-level things |
| 8 |
> > like enscript which I just added, is it an absolute must? |
| 9 |
> > Besides this is easy enough to fix if someone encounters a missing |
| 10 |
> > dependency. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Just try your best to be comprehensive; we can always add more dependencies |
| 13 |
> as they are found. But a comprehensive, accurate set of dependencies *is* |
| 14 |
> a good thing. |
| 15 |
Undoubtedly. OK, will try :-) |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Dan Armak |
| 19 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 20 |
Matan, Israel |
Archives