| 1 |
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:49:36PM +0300, Dan Armak wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I understand that. Problem is, most packages don't have a published list for |
| 4 |
> the basic utilities which they use. To find out you basically have to read |
| 5 |
> the Makefile and look for any such commands. Buildinig an 'empty' system that |
| 6 |
> doesn't even have flex etc. sounds rather difficult, unless I just remove |
| 7 |
> flex from an existing one. So in really high-level things like enscript which |
| 8 |
> I just added, is it an absolute must? |
| 9 |
> Besides this is easy enough to fix if someone encounters a missing dependency. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Just try your best to be comprehensive; we can always add more dependencies as |
| 12 |
they are found. But a comprehensive, accurate set of dependencies *is* a good |
| 13 |
thing. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o> |
| 17 |
President/CEO http://www.gentoo.org |
| 18 |
Gentoo Technologies, Inc. |
Archives