| 1 |
Arturo Garcia wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> And, I won't give up. I am very patient and packages.gentoo.org WILL come |
| 4 |
> back to life one way or another. Even if it has to be rewritten. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Personally, I don't see the problem of someone else picking up the pieces, |
| 7 |
rewriting it, and going to town with it. The source code is in CVS on |
| 8 |
sources.gentoo.org. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I've toyed with the idea of taking GPNL[1] and making a p.g.o clone, but I'm not |
| 11 |
all that interested. If someone wants the source code to my webpages as well, |
| 12 |
I'm willing to cough it up, though duplicating the backend has been available[2] |
| 13 |
for a good long while. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Anyway, as rude as this sounds, no devs have any responsibility to provide any |
| 16 |
functionality just because another dev used to. What that really means is, |
| 17 |
we're all too busy and nobody's interested in doing it. Most OSS projects are a |
| 18 |
one-man force anyway. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Steve |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
p.s. I miss it too. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
1. http://spaceparanoids.org/gentoo/gpnl/ |
| 25 |
2. http://spaceparanoids.org/svn/?root=gpnl |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives