1 |
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> 1. Revision number must be no longer than 9999: |
4 |
> 1a. to make <=X-r9999 reliable, |
5 |
> 1b. to prevent pathological uses of revision as date. |
6 |
> |
7 |
|
8 |
Let's just hope nobody starts using tex version numbering and so on. |
9 |
Dates might be used in cases where upstream doesn't publish sane |
10 |
revisions (in fact, texlive versions are dates, albeit at the year |
11 |
level). |
12 |
|
13 |
I'm not saying this isn't a good idea, I just could see where it might |
14 |
crash into reality at some point. |
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
Rich |