| 1 |
On Tuesday 11 December 2001 1:23, you wrote: |
| 2 |
> most scripts refer to bash like this |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> #!/bin/bash |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> putting another one in the path doesn't work around this at all |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Perhaps gentoo policy could be to make ebuilds reference: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
#!/bin/ebuild-bash |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
which by default would be a sym-link to bash, but on a sandbox system would |
| 13 |
have the dynamic bash in place? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I don't know how much of an issue using the wrong shell is, I don't know how |
| 16 |
often people will encounter problems, but I do know that when bash got |
| 17 |
version skewed (or something) on my Debian system, it was a nightmare. |
Archives