Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: dolsen@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal to end-of-life tree-clean old profiles/updates/ files
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 07:14:17
Message-Id: 20121210101307.0978c23f@sf
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal to end-of-life tree-clean old profiles/updates/ files by Brian Dolbec
1 On Sun, 09 Dec 2012 21:15:37 -0800
2 Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > No, once they are downloaded, they don't change ever after the quarterly
5 > rollover which starts a new updates file.
6
7 gentoo-x86/profiles/updates $ LANG=C ls -1 --sort=time
8
9 4Q-2012
10 3Q-2012
11 1Q-2008
12 2Q-2012
13 4Q-2011
14 1Q-2012
15 3Q-2011
16 2Q-2011
17 1Q-2011
18 2Q-2005
19 3Q-2008
20 4Q-2010
21 1Q-2005
22 2Q-2008
23 3Q-2010
24 2Q-2010
25 1Q-2010
26 3Q-2004
27 4Q-2009
28 3Q-2009
29 2Q-2009
30 1Q-2009
31 4Q-2008
32 3Q-2005
33 3Q-2007
34 4Q-2007
35 2Q-2007
36 1Q-2007
37 4Q-2006
38 2Q-2006
39 3Q-2006
40 1Q-2006
41 4Q-2005
42 4Q-2004
43 2Q-2004
44 1Q-2004
45
46 old entries are done in different context (comparing to 2012):
47
48 - some packages change names 2 or 3 times
49 - slots have different meaning
50
51 moreover:
52
53 - if you set your PORTDIR to different
54 directory you'll get all that full update.
55 And will break the system. Old profile entries
56 used to break eclass-manpages and latex-base
57 (due to double renaming)
58
59 Random example:
60
61 Let's loot at why 2Q-2005 was changed in 2010:
62 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351760
63
64 Thus the reason for removal is simple:
65 old entries are potentially buggy as nobody
66 verifies them.
67
68 --
69
70 Sergei

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies