| 1 |
On 29/08/2012 15:16, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
>>> > > Also, some people are probably going to try to get some pkgconf |
| 3 |
>>> > > support directly into gcc, in form of '-something libfoo' to make |
| 4 |
>>> > > it grab everything magically, I think. |
| 5 |
>> > |
| 6 |
>> > You have a future as a comedian. |
| 7 |
> Sir, you are going too far. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I'm just saying that relying on something like that is a ludicrous notion. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Okay so somebody might actually try to do that, not going to debate that |
| 12 |
— people have been out of their mind before. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
But developers actually relying on it? I find it very hard, as that |
| 15 |
basically means you're introducing build systems that only ever work on |
| 16 |
a theoretical GCC 4.8 _and nothing else_. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
So can you see what makes me laugh in your statement? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
| 22 |
flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
Archives