Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: derosa <derosa@×××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Porting gentoo to the Alpha
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 16:19:02
Message-Id: 003901c130d8$9559bd00$14002a0a@wizard
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Porting gentoo to the Alpha by Daniel Robbins
1 E3 that's the editor written in assembler right ?
2 I will just make vim part of the base system tarball for the alpha port,
3 other items will of course have to change also, no more grub or lilo, and I
4 will have to add milo for booting.
5 I will continue to play with the latest snapshots.
6
7 I also had an idea, for people stuck behind a nasty firewall, or no internet
8 connection, that want to build everything.
9
10 Have a special build cd, that has a 'snapshot' of the distfiles needed for a
11 build, and emerge system. And the snapshot from cvs equivolent to whats on
12 the disk. I have been using this method, on a couple of boxes at work, and
13 it seems to work well for me. I use the build cd as a base, and just add the
14 build tarball, and cvs tarball along with the distfiles.
15
16 Joe
17
18 > > I have recently set up an alpha machine running rh 7.1. I would like to
19 port
20 > > gentoo to the alpha chipset. My questions: Are there any parts of the
21 > > portage tree that are binary ? Would it make more sense to start from
22 rc6
23 > > build or rc5 build ?
24 >
25 > Um; the e3 editor won't work for you. That's a minor issue. Other than
26 that,
27 > you should be OK. Start with an rc6 build image in about a week.
28 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Porting gentoo to the Alpha Ben Lutgens <blutgens@×××××××××××.org>