Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Francesco R <vivo@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] crap use flags in the profiles
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:11:49
Message-Id: 431474CD.3070502@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] crap use flags in the profiles by "Stephen P. Becker"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4
5 > Is this also a good time to note that the amd64 and x86 could
6 > *easily* be covered under the same keyword? We cover a large
7 > variety of mips machines/userlands under one keyword, with
8 > differences much more significant then that between x86 and amd64.
9
10 Sorry I disagree with this, differences exists and sometimes are a
11 problem. Some package and library don't compile cleanly under amd64 arch.
12 On few but existant cases it's good to have two different archs. Not
13 even going near the analizing the differences in the profiles.
14
15 rgs, Francesco
16 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
17 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
18 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
19
20 iD8DBQFDFHTN1wNBTLVPMuARAkCpAJ4gkQQ9Ntp9j5dsldyFLLt1lj/iTgCfahlF
21 avwo9tHBaW1LTWWPeLPDFO4=
22 =yYUZ
23 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
24
25 --
26 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies