| 1 |
On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 15:56:32 -0400 "Nathan L. Adams" <nadams@××××.org> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| I don't think any of the devs would suggest that *any* fix should be |
| 4 |
| accepted without first testing it (under the current process). If you |
| 5 |
| don't believe me, submit it an ebuild and keyword it as stable on a |
| 6 |
| platform that you have not tested it on. The change I'm suggesting is |
| 7 |
| having either the reporter or the Team Lead verify that the 'fix' |
| 8 |
| actually works. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Oh absolutely, I agree entirely that it is a vital part of the QA |
| 11 |
process that the team lead verifies that an arch developer has correctly |
| 12 |
managed to use ekeyword. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives