1 |
On Fri, 2019-12-20 at 18:55 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
2 |
> > > > > > On Fri, 20 Dec 2019, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
3 |
> > Should we use this to drop RDEPEND from pkg_*inst/rm phases ? |
4 |
> > PMS states "RDEPEND (unless the particular dependency results in a |
5 |
> > circular dependency, in which case it may be installed later)" |
6 |
> > which is |
7 |
> > kind of "maybe maybe not" and I'm not sure how one can rely on |
8 |
> > RDEPEND |
9 |
> > for those phases in their ebuilds if another random ebuild can |
10 |
> > trigger |
11 |
> > a case where it's not satisfied. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> This wording has already been updated in git. It just says "RDEPEND" |
14 |
> now |
15 |
> for these four phases: |
16 |
> |
17 |
> https://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/head/pms.html#x1-720008.1 |
18 |
> |
19 |
> |
20 |
|
21 |
Ok. |
22 |
My question still stands though, so that we can avoid mutual RDEPEND |
23 |
cycles and also, as you noted on the bug, in a x-compile setting, CHOST |
24 |
deps are not really needed at installation. |