1 |
On Monday 30 July 2001 01:06, you wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 10:13:03AM +0300, Dan Armak wrote: |
3 |
> > As for versioning: I believe (I'm still waiting for the LDP guy's |
4 |
> > confirmation) that an index file inside the archive is always |
5 |
> > autogenerated when the archive is autogenerated. We can use its mtime |
6 |
> > data to add a timestamp as an ebuild version. Is there a problem with |
7 |
> > setting/overriding PV from within an ebuild? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Yes. The best way is to grab one, change the name and upload it to |
10 |
> ibiblio.org. I'm not going to be hacking at Portage to deal with archives |
11 |
> with no version numbers; the problem is with the archive that doesn't have |
12 |
> a version number, not Portage. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> BTW, you may want to suggest that their archive generation script be |
15 |
> upgraded so that the generated archives have an attached version number or |
16 |
> date. |
17 |
|
18 |
We have, and they agreed. Now there are new problems. See my post on the |
19 |
overriding/disabling checksums thread. |
20 |
-- |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Dan Armak |
24 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team |
25 |
Matan, Israel |