| 1 |
On Sunday 15 April 2012 21:04:01 Jeroen Roovers wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:55:04 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Well, I currently manually do eix searching to check it, maybe would |
| 4 |
> > be a way to compare eix outputs with "${CATEGORY}/${PKGNAME}" from bug |
| 5 |
> > summaries (bugs without that naming structure would be uncovered by |
| 6 |
> > this, but we would still be able to easily check for obsolete bug |
| 7 |
> > reports). |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I only started fixing summaries to include valid, canonical |
| 10 |
> cat/pkg[-ver] strings a few years ago because searching for a full |
| 11 |
> atom in bugzilla's search would otherwise (and still does) fail. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
+1 |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
i'm a bit more anal and generally prefer it to be the first item in the summary |
| 16 |
as it makes scanning through summaries much easier. having an arbitrary |
| 17 |
series of words before it makes it a bit harder imo. |
| 18 |
-mike |
Archives