| 1 |
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:55:04 +0200 |
| 2 |
Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Well, I currently manually do eix searching to check it, maybe would |
| 5 |
> be a way to compare eix outputs with "${CATEGORY}/${PKGNAME}" from bug |
| 6 |
> summaries (bugs without that naming structure would be uncovered by |
| 7 |
> this, but we would still be able to easily check for obsolete bug |
| 8 |
> reports). |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I only started fixing summaries to include valid, canonical |
| 11 |
cat/pkg[-ver] strings a few years ago because searching for a full |
| 12 |
atom in bugzilla's search would otherwise (and still does) fail. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Before that it was mayhem, and it's mainly the older bugs you appear be |
| 15 |
worried about. Having a list of bugs to fix the cat/pkg for would have |
| 16 |
more uses than the one you're interested in. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
jer |
Archives