1 |
I've got to throw an idea in here.... How about a doxygen-style |
2 |
documentation? No, it doesn't have to be doxygen, but I'm thinking of |
3 |
this idea. Instead of looking at every eclass, why not have some |
4 |
standard-format documentation in an eclass itself and let a tool create |
5 |
the documentation in whichever format he wishes to do so. |
6 |
Just my 2 cents... |
7 |
On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 18:26 -0500, Dan Meltzer wrote: |
8 |
> Uhh... to stick my head in... |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I'd be willing to write up some documentation for the various |
11 |
> eclasses, what format would you like them in? man-page style or what? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> |
14 |
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:20:35 -0500, Chris Gianelloni |
15 |
> <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
16 |
> > On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 10:55 -0500, Hasan Khalil wrote: |
17 |
> > > AFAIK, there is no user documentation for most eclasses' options, |
18 |
> > > including this one. That's the whole problem IMO. |
19 |
> > > |
20 |
> > > But maybe that's just my opinion and it's not shared with anyone else, |
21 |
> > > in which case this message should be disregarded. |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > Like I say any time a dev mentions anything about a lack of |
24 |
> > documentation... |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > There will be some as soon as you write it! |
27 |
> > |
28 |
> > *grin* |
29 |
> > |
30 |
> > I will admit that I am pretty bad about documentation myself, so it is |
31 |
> > definitely something that we all need to work on improving. |
32 |
> > |
33 |
> > -- |
34 |
> > Chris Gianelloni |
35 |
> > Release Engineering - Operational/QA Manager |
36 |
> > Games - Developer |
37 |
> > Gentoo Linux |
38 |
> > |
39 |
> > |
40 |
> > |
41 |
> |
42 |
> -- |
43 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
44 |
> |
45 |
> |
46 |
-- |
47 |
Benjamin Schindler <config@g.o> |
48 |
Gentoo Foundation |
49 |
|
50 |
|
51 |
-- |
52 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |