| 1 |
On 10 August 2015 at 11:46, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> As I see it, a lot of people already stuff the bug number into the |
| 3 |
> summary and I can't really say anything against that. It gives a nice |
| 4 |
> overview when you look at it: |
| 5 |
> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/ |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Given that fact, I am not sure we can convince people to repeat the bug |
| 8 |
> number in the description of the commit. However, the bug url definitely |
| 9 |
> does not fit into the summary, but in the description. That would be an |
| 10 |
> argument for the bug url thing (so we actually have both |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Its also "nice" to see that in #gentoo-commits, becasue it triggers |
| 14 |
wilkins to automatically fetch and display the summary of the |
| 15 |
referenced bug, expanding the context. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
That behaviour is not *always* nice ( ie: dozens of commits doing |
| 18 |
keywording gets a bit spammy sometimes ), but used well it is nice. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Doing that with a Gentoo-Bug: <URL> or similar means we have to |
| 21 |
enhance the commit reporting drone to give that context if that |
| 22 |
behaviour is deemed desirable. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Kent |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL |
Archives