| 1 |
On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 12:22, Per Wigren wrote: |
| 2 |
> JFS is the only FS I've had problems with.. The last version I used was 1.0.3 |
| 3 |
> though, so it may have gotten a bit better now... |
| 4 |
> Still, using JFS corrupted my 120GB LV full of OGGs and pr0n... :P About 1 of |
| 5 |
> 10 files became unusable.. Sometimes when opening a sourcefile on that LV it |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Hmmm... I had a LVM on RAID-0 disaster with JFS after a week which I |
| 8 |
never had with ext3 or XFS (using thoses for months). Although I can't |
| 9 |
prove it, I suspect JFS somehow caused the array to become corrupted. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
But JFS is pretty sweet if it works for you. It is about a zippy for |
| 12 |
small files as reiserfs, while as fast as XFS for big sequencial |
| 13 |
accesses. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Matthew Kennedy |
| 17 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
Archives