| 1 |
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 12:59 PM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Dirkjan Ochtman: |
| 3 |
>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:37 PM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> So libressl is meant as a drop-in replacement for openssl. |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> Some caveats have already been discovered: |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
So, libressl is really nowhere near ready for prime time or even late |
| 10 |
night TV (perhaps the day time talk shows, but that is a stretch given |
| 11 |
the PRNG situation). I think preparing a virtual and updating |
| 12 |
dependent ebuilds for the explosion of replacements is grand, however |
| 13 |
we should make it _very_ clear to everyone that issues exist that make |
| 14 |
libressl unsafe for anything other than play time. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Thanks, |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Matthew Summers |
| 19 |
Gentoo Foundation Inc. |
| 20 |
GPG: 111B C438 35FA EDB5 B5D3 736F 45EE 5DC0 0878 9D46 |
Archives