| 1 |
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:07 AM, Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> I still don't see the advantage in that. Maybe I should have expressed |
| 4 |
> my concerns more vocally, but in general I don't have time to worry |
| 5 |
> about all the little things. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:67#Issues_with_the_current_system |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
It is OK to disagree with the decision, but having gone through the |
| 11 |
GLEP process this is about as deliberative and formal as it gets |
| 12 |
around here. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
It is pretty rare for the council to be asked to approve a change that |
| 15 |
isn't controversial. For the most part devs are fairly free to just |
| 16 |
implement non-controversial changes by announcing them on -dev and |
| 17 |
proceeding if there seems to be consensus. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
We're a community-based distro. We're all here because we care a lot |
| 20 |
- not for the paycheck. I think feeling passionate about |
| 21 |
changes/issues/etc is pretty normal. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Rich |
Archives