| 1 |
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 19:52 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 09 March 2005 06:09 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 16:57 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On Tuesday 08 March 2005 04:21 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > What about the libconf project ? Can't we still put that to use |
| 6 |
> > > > somehow (sorry, don't know the details anymore of it) to solve this |
| 7 |
> > > > issue? |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > what do you mean 'still' ? when have we ever used it ? |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > Never, but it was planned, thus the 'still' |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> ive never heard of such a plan :) |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> besides, libconf sounds like just another item that would clutter up the |
| 16 |
> portage requirements ... but then again, i dont know what the original |
| 17 |
> intentions were ... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
It was probably about a year and a half/two years back, before you did |
| 20 |
the euseradd, etc stuff. libconf is a project Dams did that makes |
| 21 |
changes to config files transparent to the format being used, and I then |
| 22 |
he have a few interfaces to it (php, perl, whatever). Its just that |
| 23 |
then we can do fairly generic config parsing stuff (and might be usefull |
| 24 |
in the installer project as well). Don't know if Dams want to give a |
| 25 |
status update/overview ... |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Dunno, just throwing around ideas. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Martin Schlemmer |
| 32 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer |
| 33 |
Cape Town, South Africa |
Archives