Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [g2boojum@gentoo.org: glep 27 thoughts]
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:52:17
Message-Id: 200503091952.05483.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [g2boojum@gentoo.org: glep 27 thoughts] by Martin Schlemmer
1 On Wednesday 09 March 2005 06:09 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
2 > On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 16:57 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
3 > > On Tuesday 08 March 2005 04:21 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
4 > > > What about the libconf project ? Can't we still put that to use
5 > > > somehow (sorry, don't know the details anymore of it) to solve this
6 > > > issue?
7 > >
8 > > what do you mean 'still' ? when have we ever used it ?
9 >
10 > Never, but it was planned, thus the 'still'
11
12 ive never heard of such a plan :)
13
14 besides, libconf sounds like just another item that would clutter up the
15 portage requirements ... but then again, i dont know what the original
16 intentions were ...
17 -mike
18 --
19 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [g2boojum@gentoo.org: glep 27 thoughts] Martin Schlemmer <azarah@g.o>