Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Barry Shaw <baz@×××××××××××××××.nz>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Alternative names for binaries in app-text/cook and dev-util/cook
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 21:40:36
Message-Id: 40A9314E.5020009@scms.waikato.ac.nz
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Alternative names for binaries in app-text/cook and dev-util/cook by Karl Trygve Kalleberg
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Karl Trygve Kalleberg wrote:
5 | On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 04:50:48PM +1200, Barry Shaw wrote:
6 |
7 | The name clashes that happen in /usr/portage/packages/All are a side
8 effect
9 | of the current implementation of the binary package system, and is in,
10 imho,
11 | very unfortunate.
12 |
13
14 We've implemented a binary distribution and maintenance system and in
15 the process have found a number of problems like this with portage and
16 binaries. What would be the appropriate forum to mention these problems
17 in (gentoo-portage-dev maybe?).
18
19 Thanks
20 Baz
21
22
23
24 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
25 Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
26
27 iD8DBQFAqTFOJvZkjpKMF2wRAvBzAJ47Z1qy4fNaPxE8ruhtwY/fXncaGgCguIcX
28 oPz3Aer6cfpaAt8fUeNjw1E=
29 =ugCy
30 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
31
32 --
33 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies