From: | Chad Huneycutt <chad.huneycutt@×××.org> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: All Developers! | ||
Date: | Sat, 10 Nov 2001 09:37:22 | ||
Message-Id: | 3BED57AA.4030301@acm.org | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: All Developers! by Andreas Voegele |
1 | Andreas Voegele wrote: |
2 | |
3 | BTW, if a single tab was used in front of dependencies the output |
4 | > would look like this: |
5 | > |
6 | > tabwidth 4: |
7 | > |
8 | > DEPEND="virtual/glibc |
9 | > virtual/x11 |
10 | > RDEPEND="virtual/glibc |
11 | > virtual/x11 |
12 | > |
13 | > tabwidth 8: |
14 | > |
15 | > DEPEND="virtual/glibc |
16 | > virtual/x11 |
17 | > RDEPEND="virtual/glibc |
18 | > virtual/x11 |
19 | > |
20 | > IMHO both outputs look good, and with this solution developers could |
21 | > still set the tabwidth to 4 or 8. |
22 | |
23 | The problem with tabs comes in when you do stuff like: |
24 | |
25 | local t |
26 | local u |
27 | t = "some string like this" # comment here |
28 | u = "some other longer string" # another comment |
29 | |
30 | The comments will not necessarily line up when tabwidths are different. |
31 | |
32 | Chad |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: All Developers! | Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o> |