| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Alon Bar-Lev wrote: |
| 5 |
| If we know there may be a future problem, why make the next *VALID* |
| 6 |
| addition perform extra work? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I think the reasoning is that whilst there may be a future problem, |
| 9 |
there currently isn't. If it gets changed to gnome-keyring, it will |
| 10 |
definitely requires all the users of the keyring USE flag to change it. |
| 11 |
~ We could save them that hassle until there is actually a conflict? |
| 12 |
It's just a design decision, either we do, or we don't, but I don't |
| 13 |
think it's too big a deal. Depends if we want to be strictly correct, |
| 14 |
or delay a small headache for our users? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Mike 5:) |
| 17 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 18 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkgLdjAACgkQu7rWomwgFXrBDQCeJHUe52Czxdn41fyjmfSI7Fjt |
| 21 |
og4AoKhxy1B8rp6k/g8o2PFcBw2DLphm |
| 22 |
=RkIz |
| 23 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives