1 |
On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 19:03 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 21:34:09 -0400 |
3 |
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > we could care less what users do with /etc/profile.d ... the point is |
6 |
> > that *only* users should use /etc/profile.d ... we dont want random |
7 |
> > Gentoo developer Foo installing some Bar.sh into /etc/profile.d with |
8 |
> > package app-crap/FooBar |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Would the following in /et/profile be a solution to this problem? |
11 |
> |
12 |
> for x in $( < /etc/profile.d/.default); do |
13 |
> source "/etc/profile.d/${x}" |
14 |
> done |
15 |
> |
16 |
> That way devs could install stuff there, but it would only be run if |
17 |
> users added it to the .default file. |
18 |
|
19 |
If we do something like this, I'll rather not source it, but run it via |
20 |
the current shell. This should discourage devs to install stuff |
21 |
touching the environment there rather than /etc/env.d/. |
22 |
|
23 |
----- |
24 |
# Append any additional sh scripts found in /etc/profile.d/: |
25 |
for file in /etc/profile.d/*.sh ; do |
26 |
if [ -x "${file}" ] ; then |
27 |
"${file}" |
28 |
fi |
29 |
done |
30 |
----- |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
As for above, this is one of the examples why we rather did not add |
34 |
it .. everybody want something added .. global control, per user |
35 |
control, etc :/ |
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
Martin Schlemmer |