| 1 |
On Wednesday 11 Sep 2002 16:50, Karl Trygve Kalleberg wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Why do we have ebuilds for dev-java/sun-j2sdk and dev-java/sun-jdk? |
| 4 |
> > These both currently point to the same Sun Java VM and SDK, 1.4.0. |
| 5 |
> > Has this created any dependency issues in the portage tree? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> The former builds the Sun JDK from sources (or attempts to, it's not |
| 8 |
> finished). The latter is an ebuild for the binary that Sun |
| 9 |
> distribute. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> According to Sun, the sources they provide are not the same as the |
| 12 |
> ones they package in their binary. They are not up-front specific |
| 13 |
> about the differences, but I'd assume they also some third-party |
| 14 |
> licensed stuff. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> The original goal of the j2sdk was to have a proper VM plugin for |
| 17 |
> mozilla when compiled with gcc-3.2. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Kind regards, |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Karl T |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
I unmasked the sdk but none of the SRC_URI seem to be available from |
| 24 |
http://java.sun.com/ |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Gentoo Linux (portage-2.0.36). KDE: 3.0.3 Qt: 3.0.5 |
| 27 |
AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1600+ 512MB. Kernel: 2.4.19-win4lin. GCC 3.2 |
| 28 |
Linux user #275590 (http://counter.li.org/). up 1 day, 9 h, 25 min |
| 29 |
#=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o=# |
Archives