1 |
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr.": |
2 |
> On 7/27/14, 1:42 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
3 |
>> Only one person said he had to manually build 2 GNOME related packages, |
4 |
>> simple-scan and something else |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> So, broken? Far from it. More like essential feature. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> People have just listed some known races dynamic deps have, and I take |
9 |
>> those races anyday over an regression that causes |
10 |
>> endless rebuilding... |
11 |
> |
12 |
> I think this really boils down to deciding on the tradeoff between |
13 |
> correctness and speed. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Even the example above shows that with dynamic rebuilds some manual |
16 |
> rebuilds were needed, which I interpret as dynamic deps not being correct. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Static deps go the other way around: they do lead to more rebuilds, and |
19 |
> I think no one is denying that. However, they seem more predictable to me. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Paweł |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
his argument is pointless, because he got static deps on all those |
25 |
ebuilds now anyway |