Archives
Archives
| From: | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" use flags? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 11 Feb 2016 14:46:23 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAATnKFCZ4Su-4xrn6TKRDbRetcKc-X=F5hwPuPr7=cWzdRqpSw@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" use flags? by "M. J. Everitt" |
||
| 1 | On 12 February 2016 at 03:43, M. J. Everitt <m.j.everitt@×××.org> wrote: |
| 2 | > auto-unmask has a very inconsistent, unstable way of |
| 3 | > working with a package.use folder not file ... |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | auto-unmask consistently adds items to the file with the highest |
| 7 | dictionary sort. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | So if you name all the files with numerical prefixes, 00 .. 99, "99" |
| 10 | is where auto-unmask will write to. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Kent |
| 14 | |
| 15 | KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" use flags? | "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org> |