Archives
Archives
| From: | "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" use flags? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 11 Feb 2016 14:49:07 | ||
| Message-Id: | 56BC9F54.7070400@iee.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" use flags? by Kent Fredric |
||
| 1 | On 11/02/16 14:46, Kent Fredric wrote: |
| 2 | > On 12 February 2016 at 03:43, M. J. Everitt <m.j.everitt@×××.org> wrote: |
| 3 | >> auto-unmask has a very inconsistent, unstable way of |
| 4 | >> working with a package.use folder not file ... |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > auto-unmask consistently adds items to the file with the highest |
| 7 | > dictionary sort. |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > So if you name all the files with numerical prefixes, 00 .. 99, "99" |
| 10 | > is where auto-unmask will write to. |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | Well, that's obvious ........ |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" use flags? | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> |