| 1 |
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 17:26:39 -0500 (EST) |
| 2 |
"Caleb Tennis" <caleb@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > X and Y are pretty much irrelevant. The important factor is Z, the |
| 4 |
> > impact of leaving things the way they are. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Well, I'm asking the council to discuss when "pretty much" irrelevant |
| 7 |
> no longer applies. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Compared to the cost of causing yet more arch breakage, which takes |
| 10 |
huge amounts of time to fix and leads to far more problems, I'd say X |
| 11 |
and Y should be something like one billion and three billion |
| 12 |
respectively, except in those rare cases where Z is genuinely |
| 13 |
significant. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Really, I'd like to see some genuine examples of cases where people |
| 16 |
think they have a legitimate value of Z... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives