Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Daniel Drake <dsd@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 49 - take 2
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 19:42:23
Message-Id: 447216CA.7010202@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 49 - take 2 by Paul de Vrieze
1 Paul de Vrieze wrote:
2 > First of all, I'm in limbo on this. Certainly not dead set against it. If
3 > this were to be used, I'd like to add the following line: "At least 1 of
4 > these three must be actively involved in the development of the package
5 > manager".
6 >
7 > Could others please provide input on this question.
8
9 I'm not convinced that counting the number of developers is a good metric.
10
11 I think this should be left to the council.
12
13 Daniel
14
15
16
17 --
18 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list