| 1 |
It was only a suggestion, not a decision. Of course, there are only a |
| 2 |
little number of this early systems. |
| 3 |
i686 would be really nice, i386 would be nice, too ;-) |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 20:45 +0100, Roy Bamford wrote: |
| 6 |
> On 2006.10.09 19:42, Peter Weber wrote: |
| 7 |
> [snip] |
| 8 |
> > But to include the sources need simply too much space. I also think |
| 9 |
> > it it enough to deliver only one stage3 (i686 on the x86-disk, x86-64 |
| 10 |
> > on |
| 11 |
> > amd64-disk...). |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Greetz |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> [snip] |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Peter, |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Such a disk will not support P1s and AMD k6 CPUs (or older). |
| 20 |
> Is anyone still using Gentoo on anything older ? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Dropping support for x86 <i686 is a debate we need to have some time I |
| 23 |
> suppose, its a question of when. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> There is clearly only a few users, besides myself using systems that |
| 26 |
> old, since there were very few forums posts about the original 2006.1 |
| 27 |
> x86 media not workign on P1 and AMD k6 based systems. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Regards, |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Roy Bamford |
| 32 |
> (neddyseagoon) |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives