1 |
On Friday 02 November 2007, Roy Marples wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 11:38 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
3 |
> > wrong. the point of the discussion on the gentoo dev mailing list is to |
4 |
> > go over the exported API for *ebuilds*, not for the implementation. the |
5 |
> > implementation is already baked and really, Marijn shouldnt have sent it |
6 |
> > to the gentoo dev mailing list in the first place. your pointless POSIX |
7 |
> > conversions have no place in the discussion. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> However, I notice that you have no problem discussing the implementation |
10 |
> of ebuild commits or are they special in some way? |
11 |
|
12 |
that's because the point of said discussions *is about the implementation*. |
13 |
this thread is not about the implementation, but about the API. besides, i'd |
14 |
give you the same answer there when you attempt to get people to change |
15 |
perfectly valid (and preferred) code structures. |
16 |
|
17 |
> My POSIX conversations encourage the use of POSIX over non portable bash |
18 |
> as that's something I try and encourage. And that is very pertinent to |
19 |
> -dev. |
20 |
|
21 |
and the answer is still the same. POSIX conversions are irrelevant until you |
22 |
can propose solutions for the things bash can do but POSIX cannot. you can |
23 |
only provide workarounds or hacks, so any further attempt on the topic is |
24 |
half way conversions that lead to ugly inconsistencies. |
25 |
-mike |