| 1 |
I think wxMaxima came up on the gentoo-science list; there may already |
| 2 |
be a request for an ebuild and someone may even have done it. Meanwhile, |
| 3 |
ordinary Maxima, including the standard X interface, is already in |
| 4 |
Portage. So are emacs, xemacs and texmacs, all of which provide a |
| 5 |
user-friendly interface to Maxima. I personally use it from texmacs, |
| 6 |
because it formats the results in highly-readable mathematical form, |
| 7 |
rather than the "ASCII art" format of conventional Maxima. Will wxMaxima |
| 8 |
do that? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Rafael Fernández wrote: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
>Hi !! |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
>How are you all ? I've been using Gentoo for a couple of months and I really like it. I've been working little hard for Debian until now, for 2 years more or less, but it is a very slow-motion distribution, and I like the agility that Gentoo has. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
>I'm studying Computer Science in Madrid (Spain), and I've to sit for my final exams. What a surprise when I had to study Algebra and I couldn't find wxMaxima in Portage... Well, I want to know how to make ebuilds (please if you could send me the web site that explains it), but the main reason because I write here is that I suggest you to make an ebuild for wxmaxima: http://wxmaxima.sourceforge.net, there is the source-code and I have read somewhere that is GPL licensed, so there won't be any legal troubles. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
>Thank you so much. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives