| 1 |
Hi all! |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Allthough i'm not using gentoo for a while, i'm tracking, the mailing |
| 4 |
lists.. to check out how its going. |
| 5 |
About qpgk, i believe that if it's not allready quite a handy "pocket knife" |
| 6 |
in Gentoo, it will become one, I find it so "cool" and practical, basically, |
| 7 |
ITS A MUST in gentoo. |
| 8 |
It's extremelly usefull for checking if a certain package is installed, what |
| 9 |
files owns, wich version it is, and also to see the owner of certain files, |
| 10 |
among other things. |
| 11 |
It would be nice to also check, and "confront" the available version, with |
| 12 |
the installed version of a package that has just been queried. Something |
| 13 |
like: |
| 14 |
I do not know if it does this.. but it would be nice.. to see the version |
| 15 |
of the installed and the latest version available. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Keep up the good work everyone! |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Cheers, Miguel Sousa Filipe |
| 21 |
----- Original Message ----- |
| 22 |
From: "Vitaly Kushneriuk" <vitaly_kushneriuk@×××××.com> |
| 23 |
To: "Gentoo-dev" <gentoo-dev@g.o> |
| 24 |
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 3:38 PM |
| 25 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] qpkg |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> On Sun, 2002-01-13 at 16:46, John Stalker wrote: |
| 29 |
> > qpkg is quite useful. Thanks, Vitaly. |
| 30 |
> Thanks, I'm glad you find it usefull. |
| 31 |
> I was waiting for more feedback :-) |
| 32 |
> Any one using it out there? HAve some comments? |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> Regards, |
| 35 |
> /Vitaly. |
| 36 |
> _______________________________________________ |
| 37 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 38 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 39 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
Archives