Archives
Archives
| From: | justin <jlec@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Please review fortran-2.eclass next round | ||
| Date: | Fri, 17 Jun 2011 06:41:08 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4DFAF6DB.5060003@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Please review fortran-2.eclass next round by Mike Frysinger |
||
| 1 | >> I wasn't aware of that. We are lacking any documentation about the |
| 2 | >> proper documentation for manpages in all eclass writing guides. |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > the syntax is fully documented in the utility that generates it. see the awk |
| 5 | > in the eclass-manpages filesdir. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | |
| 8 | This is not a proper way of documentation. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Please review fortran-2.eclass next round | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |