| 1 |
On 20/07/18 13:20, Ben Kohler wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 07/19/18 20:54, Mikle Kolyada wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> +1. widely used profiles should have as least flags enabled by default |
| 5 |
>> as possible, I would not be happy with +udev on my servers. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
> I disagree with this premise. The default and most widely used profiles |
| 8 |
> should fit the most common use cases. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I'd be curious as to what problems would be caused on your servers if |
| 11 |
> this flag were turned on-- specifically what packages will get the flag |
| 12 |
> turned on, where that bothers you? On my servers, the impact is very |
| 13 |
> minimal. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I'm not totally sure that my proposal of USE=udev is correct/justified, |
| 16 |
> but there are a few counter-arguments I've heard that I don't think hold |
| 17 |
> water, I'd like to focus on the others. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> -Ben |
| 20 |
Ben: Were you trying to sign your email .. a strange .asc attachment |
| 21 |
came through this end? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Can we make a 'minimal'/container/etc _profile_ for such use-cases |
| 24 |
perhaps? so that linux 'default' might have +udev but this minimal |
| 25 |
doesn't .. or won't the overlapping of profiles allow this? |
Archives