| 1 |
On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 01/27/2018 11:42 AM, Gordon Pettey wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Why not use a hash of the file name instead of its contents? That |
| 4 |
>> seems like it would be much simpler, and that's not going to reduce |
| 5 |
>> the output space for balance... |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> That's the proposal =P |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I'm not following, then. What's all this about a temporary directory |
| 10 |
because of not knowing the hash in advance? The ebuild must specify |
| 11 |
the file name, or src_unpack wouldn't work. There is never a point |
| 12 |
where the file name, and therefore its hash, is unknown. |
Archives