| 1 |
On 01/17/2011 08:10 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 13:49 Sun 16 Jan , Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Does anyone care to justify their "block the old name" habits? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> How about playing nicely with overlays where the moves didn't happen |
| 6 |
> (yet)? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
That seems like a somewhat justifiable use case. If such a blocker is |
| 9 |
placed in RDEPEND and specifies the SLOT (if the package happens to be |
| 10 |
slotted), then it shouldn't cause a problem. Even if the package move |
| 11 |
gets applied to the blocker, it will be obvious that a slotted circular |
| 12 |
blocker in RDEPEND should simply be ignored. |
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Thanks, |
| 15 |
Zac |
Archives