1 |
On Fri, 2007-11-05 at 12:12 -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote: |
2 |
> Josh Saddler wrote: |
3 |
> > Jim Ramsay wrote: |
4 |
> > > I suppose I could also propose: |
5 |
> > > |
6 |
> > > 4) netscape-flash just RDEPENDS on libflashsupport all the time. |
7 |
> > > It's certainly not a large library to be added on. |
8 |
> > > |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > That is a terrible idea. Don't make it "depend" on something that it |
11 |
> > clearly does *not* depend on. Flash works just fine without the |
12 |
> > optional add-ons, and those are *definitely* optional. I've never |
13 |
> > needed libflashsupport and would prefer not seeing useless cruft |
14 |
> > attached to a perfectly working Flash installation. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Point taken - If you don't want the extra features you don't want |
17 |
> libflashsupport at all. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I could make it so that if all of the USE flags for libflashsupport are |
20 |
> turned off it doesn't actually install the library at all, just gets |
21 |
> added to the list of installed packages. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> > If you're going to add it to USE, then make sure it's *not* on by |
24 |
> > default, thanks. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> This way it will adhere to your current set of global USE flags. If you |
27 |
> have pulseaudio, esd, oss, ssl, or gnutls on globally, it will install |
28 |
> libflashsupport with the appropriate hooks in it. If they are all |
29 |
> off (either globally or specifically for libflashsupport) you will |
30 |
> just get the same old netscape-flash with no add-ons. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> Is this a worthy compromise? |
33 |
|
34 |
This seems even worse.. I think either having one local use flag in |
35 |
netscape-flash is probably the best solution.. The second best is to |
36 |
have all of the use flags and RDEPEND on flash-support if any is |
37 |
enabled. |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
Olivier CrĂȘte |
41 |
tester@g.o |
42 |
Gentoo Developer |