| 1 |
On 07/25/14 15:50, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 2 |
> El vie, 25-07-2014 a las 15:38 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió: |
| 3 |
>> On 07/25/14 15:28, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> That is the reason for me thinking that maybe the way to go would be to |
| 5 |
>>> do the opposite -> keep only base-system and a few others stable and |
| 6 |
>>> drop stable for most of the rest. This big effort could be accomplished |
| 7 |
>>> in a week by other developers willing to help (like me) and would solve |
| 8 |
>>> the issue for the long term. I guess that is what HPPA team did in the |
| 9 |
>>> past and I think it's working pretty well for them (in summary, have a |
| 10 |
>>> stable tree they are able to keep stable). That will also help people in |
| 11 |
>>> ppc* teams to know that the remaining stabilization bugs, apart of being |
| 12 |
>>> much less, are important enough to deserve rapid attention, as opposed |
| 13 |
>>> to current situation that will have some important bugs mixed with tons |
| 14 |
>>> of stabilization requests of apps that got ppc stable keywords years ago |
| 15 |
>>> and are currently no so important. |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
>> Yes, please let's just do base system stable. I've been randomly taking |
| 18 |
>> care of ppc but nothing systematic. Its pretty spotty. But at the same |
| 19 |
>> time I don't like the idea of just loosing all the stabilization effort |
| 20 |
>> on the base system, so that might work best. Something to think about |
| 21 |
>> for mips too. |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
> Nice, one think we would need to discuss is what do we consider base |
| 25 |
> system :/ |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> I guess packages maintained by base-system, toolchain and... xorg-server |
| 28 |
> and co... what more |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Not sure if we could have a list of current stable tree for ppc*, once |
| 31 |
> do we have that list, ppc* teams can drop from that list what they want |
| 32 |
> and we get a new list that will be the final result. What do you think |
| 33 |
> about that? |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
At the very least, its what's needed to build the stages with catalyst. |
| 38 |
I would think we should start with base/packages, but I don't want to |
| 39 |
limit it to just those because I at least need a more for building and |
| 40 |
maintaining. Where should we start to compile such a list? |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
| 44 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
| 45 |
E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
| 46 |
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA |
| 47 |
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA |
Archives