| 1 |
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 12:57 PM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 09/20/2015 06:47 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 20.09.2015 16:26, hasufell wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On 09/20/2015 03:27 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> Please stop introducing further tree-wide changes regarding libressl. |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>> That's not possible, because in order to introduce the USE flag, we have |
| 8 |
>>> to break the dep-graph on ~arch temporarily (for 'libressl' USE flag |
| 9 |
>>> only ofc), because of circular deps. |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> I am working on restoring it now. This does not affect stable branch at |
| 12 |
>>> all and no one who is not using 'libressl' USE flag (which is |
| 13 |
>>> practically impossible currently). |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> Yet the way you execute your plan now violates several devmanual |
| 17 |
>> policies. Is there any reason for that rush? |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Any reason to bother me? There have been several threads about libressl |
| 21 |
> and the overlay has been up for more than one year I think. If you have |
| 22 |
> a suggestions, say it. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Here's a suggestion: go do something else for 48h. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Seriously. This bickering isn't helpful. You posted an idea on -dev. |
| 27 |
It might be a great idea. Let's at least allow it to be discussed |
| 28 |
before implementing it. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
This isn't about the stable branch. It is about how we do things. If |
| 31 |
everybody just started making global changes less than a day after |
| 32 |
posting about it on -dev there would be chaos. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
Rich |
Archives