| 1 |
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Matti Bickel <mabi@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
| 3 |
>> From my PoV, editing ChangeLog is like editing history. Complete no-no. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> It is possible in all major SCMs for a reason. And I (as a user) would |
| 6 |
> laugh at Changelog entries saying "um, I got that bug number wrong, it |
| 7 |
> is really #1234". If I (as a developer) log such edits, I'm wasting my |
| 8 |
> users time. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Its not possible in perforce once your change has been submitted. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> So I'll continue to edit and commit Changelogs without additional notice. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I agree that you should do this (it is rather convenient for everyone |
| 18 |
after all) but I don't think editable changelog entries are really a |
| 19 |
blocker for this migration. It seems you can append to changelogs in |
| 20 |
git which is likely sufficient for fixing mistakes that will occur. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-A |
Archives