From: | "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-libs/libusbhp: ChangeLog Manifest libusbhp-1.0.2.ebuild metadata.xml | ||
Date: | Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:32:24 | ||
Message-Id: | 3260120.GvFL1CnzYz@kailua | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-libs/libusbhp: ChangeLog Manifest libusbhp-1.0.2.ebuild metadata.xml by Mike Frysinger |
1 | Am Montag 16 Februar 2015, 06:13:10 schrieb Mike Frysinger: |
2 | |
3 | > even then, deleting an ebuild purely due to different copyright is |
4 | > complete bs. |
5 | |
6 | The requirement for Gentoo copyright in the main tree is not optional, but has |
7 | been policy for a very long time. |
8 | |
9 | Just because you've been around forever doesnt mean you can break the rules |
10 | that everyone else is supposed to follow. |
11 | |
12 | -- |
13 | Andreas K. Huettel |
14 | Gentoo Linux developer |
15 | perl, office, comrel, council |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-libs/libusbhp: ChangeLog Manifest libusbhp-1.0.2.ebuild metadata.xml | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |
Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-libs/libusbhp: ChangeLog Manifest libusbhp-1.0.2.ebuild metadata.xml | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-libs/libusbhp: ChangeLog Manifest libusbhp-1.0.2.ebuild metadata.xml | Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> |