| 1 |
On 1/9/20 3:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> Dnia January 9, 2020 5:11:46 AM UTC, Salah Coronya <salah.coronya@×××××.com> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> On 1/8/20 3:16 PM, Mikle Kolyada wrote: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>>> app-crypt/tpm-tools |
| 8 |
>>> app-crypt/tpm2-abrmd |
| 9 |
>>> app-crypt/tpm2-tools |
| 10 |
>>> app-crypt/tpm2-totp |
| 11 |
>>> app-crypt/tpm2-tss-engine |
| 12 |
>>> app-crypt/tpm2-tss |
| 13 |
>>> app-crypt/trousers |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> I would be interested in proxy-maintaining the TPM/TPM2 related |
| 17 |
>> package,as I use most of the packages (I have a physical TPM 1.2 and a |
| 18 |
>> VM with a virtual TPM 2.0), and the one's I don't yet use are closely |
| 19 |
>> related to ones I do use and are easy enough to maintain as well. Not |
| 20 |
>> interested in app-crypt/tpm-emulator, as its functionality by a is |
| 21 |
>> superseded by a package i maintain, app-crypt/swtpm. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Do you think that tpm-emulator is worth keeping, or should it be last rited in favor of swtpm? |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> -- |
| 27 |
> Best regards, |
| 28 |
> Michał Górny |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I don't think tpm-emulator is worth keeping. It should probably be last |
| 32 |
rited. The only thing I can think of that tpm-emulator has swtpm doesn't |
| 33 |
are initscripts, but I can add some if its needed. Normally swtpm will |
| 34 |
be started by qemu (for VMs) or (when used in tests) launched by the |
| 35 |
test suite. It is certainly capable of being used as a system-wide |
| 36 |
daemon to create a virtual TPM device or socket, though. |
Archives