Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: FEATURES use or misuse?
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:11:08
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] FEATURES use or misuse? by Patrick Lauer
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 23:28:57 +0100
Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote:

> And then why bother when the tree doesn't reflect PMS.
Maybe if some people would stop ignoring PMS on whim because they don't agree with something in it this wouldn't be the case. Like, when does this end? Whenever there's a policy you don't agree with, you do whatever you want? And it's the policy that's the problem? I don't get it. Anyways, this has nothing to do with PMS. Using FEATURES in the tree was frowned upon long before it even existed. The fact that it wasn't documented as such outside of mailing lists and bug reports is the real bug. -- fonts, Character is what you are in the dark. gcc-porting, wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: FEATURES use or misuse? Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o>