| 1 |
On Wednesday 05 March 2008 12:45:31 Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 22:41:58 +0530 |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Anant Narayanan <anant@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Hi, |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even |
| 8 |
> > > vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole |
| 9 |
> > > Gentoo dev list to see. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > If it's not too late for this month's meeting, I'd like to discuss |
| 12 |
> > the possibility of including a new "post" in our developer base - |
| 13 |
> > the package maintainer. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > a) The requirements to become a package maintainer for Gentoo may be |
| 16 |
> > lesser than that of the full-fledged developer. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Please elaborate on how a "full.fledged developer" would differ from a |
| 19 |
> "package maintainer" technically. What requirements and/or |
| 20 |
> priviledges do you think could be reduced? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Marius |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Perhaps there could be some honor code system at least, where the package |
| 25 |
maintainer would be restricted to their area of maintainership. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
but +1 from me, I'd be very interested in the position, considering I already |
| 28 |
proxy maintain a package. |
Archives