| 1 |
28.02.2014 18:44, Samuli Suominen пишет: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On 28/02/14 16:18, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
| 4 |
>> On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:28:30 +0200 |
| 5 |
>> Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>>> It would be very helpful if INSTALL_MASK could be overriden from an |
| 8 |
>>> ebuild, ... |
| 9 |
>> What is the intended goal? Can you give an example? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> - User has INSTALL_MASK="/lib/systemd" |
| 12 |
> - Ebuild has INSTALL_MASK_OVERRIDE="/lib/systemd/systemd-udevd |
| 13 |
> /lib/systemd/network" |
| 14 |
> - Portage's default is to respect ebuild first, then users setting, |
| 15 |
> unless he changes INSTALL_MASK_ORDER to respect his |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> I completely agree using INSTALL_MASK is 100% responsibility of the user |
| 18 |
> setting it, it's like blind 'rm -f', but some people |
| 19 |
> don't agree and keep attacking me. |
| 20 |
> I'm using the word attacking because it's constant, relentless, |
| 21 |
> repeating and I don't see an end to it. I believe Poly-C just |
| 22 |
> proofed that point in this thread. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
If the user set INSTALL_MASK improperly than he(read as 'He, NOT package |
| 26 |
maintainer') should fix the stuff if it will break. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
We allow user's to update glibc if they accidently set |
| 29 |
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~arch(even if downgrading it is really PITA), why we |
| 30 |
should behave differently here? |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Best regards, Sergey Popov |
| 34 |
Gentoo developer |
| 35 |
Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead |
| 36 |
Gentoo Qt project lead |
| 37 |
Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead |
Archives